Probabilitas Pemilihan Moda Transportasi Antara Bus Trans Gerbang Kertasusila Dengan Ka. Komuter Rute Porong – Waru

Penulis

  • Masliyah Masliyah Fakultas Teknik Universitas Yos Soedarso
  • Ricky Lautfiandana Fakultas Teknik Universitas Yos Soedarso

Abstrak

Travel actors are faced with several alternative modes of public transportation in carrying out transportation, where the various public transportation services that exist today are increasingly diverse and also transportation service users are increasingly diverse and also transportation service users who are increasingly selective in choosing which alternative mode is the most profitable to use. as a means of fulfilling their needs, as happened in the Porong area. Public transportation modes that can connect Porong, especially with the city of Surabaya, include the Trans Gerbang Kertasusila Bus and KA modes. Commuting. The choice of mode that occurs between the two modes is strongly influenced by the characteristics and reliability of the mode concerned.Therefore, this study aims to determine the factors that influence the choice of mode, determine the characteristics of the user and get the probability value of choosing the transportation mode of the Trans Gerbang Kertasusila Bus and KA. Commuting route Porong - Waru.Data collection was obtained from a survey with 144 respondents, using stated preference techniques, by making several changes to the conditions in the attributes of travel costs, travel times and departure schedules, besides data collection was also obtained by each agency regarding the Trans Gerbang Kertasusila Bus data and KA data Commuting.Based on the results of statistical tests that have been carried out, it can be concluded that the three factors, namely travel costs, travel time and departure schedule significantly influence respondents in choosing the mode of transportation, while the probability value is obtained from the utility difference equation between Trans Gerbang Kertasusila buses and KA. Commuting on a fee basis.The cost of the trip is (UBr - UKA) = -0.906 + 0.001. ∆x1, it is known that the value (PBT) is 0.75 and (PBT) is 0.25. At the time of difference in utility, train travel costs. Commuting is more expensive Rp. 2,000, -. Based on the travel time (UBr - UKA) = -0.152 + 0.066. ∆x2 is known to be the value (PBT) 0.86 and (PBT) 0.14 when the difference in utility between commuter train travel time is 30 minutes longer and based on the departure schedule (PBT) -5.049 + 0.014 ∆x3, the value (PBT) is 0.13. and (PKA) 0.87. At the time of departure utility increment is 225 minutes.Keywords: Mode Selection; Travel Actor; Bus; Train.

Referensi

Aghastya, A. (2013). Studi Pemilihan Moda Angkutan Penumpang Kota Blitar – Kota Surabaya. Tesis Magister. Tidak Untuk Dipublikasika, Magister Teknik Sipil Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November, Surabaya.

Fauzi, A. (2011). Studi Pemilihan Moda Angkutan Umum Penumpang Antara Kereta Api Komuter Arek Surokerto Dan Mikro Bus Trayek Surabaya – Mojokerto. Tugas Akhir. Tidak Untuk Dipublikasikan, Program Studi Teknik Sipil UPN “Veteran†Jawa Timur, Surabaya.

Masliyah. (2008). Kompetisi Pemilihan Moda Angkutan Penumpang Antara Jalan Raya (Mikrolet/Bison) dan Moda Jalan Rel (Komuter) Rute Surabaya – Sidoarjo. Tesis Magister. Tidak Untuk Dipublikasikan, Magister Teknik Sipil Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November, Surabaya.

Miro, F. (2005). Perencanaan Transportasi Untuk Mahasiswa, Perencana, dan Praktisi. Cetakan ke 1. Jakarta : Penerbit Erlangga.

Muhtadi, A. (2010). Modal Split Angkutan Umum Surabaya – Malang. Jurnal Neutron, Vol.10, No.2.

Okatrisza, Y. (2009). Studi Pemilihan Moda Angkutan Penumpang Antara Kereta Dan Bus Studi Kasus : Rute Jakarta – Malang kelas Eksekutif. Tesis Magister. Tidak Untuk Dipublikasikan, Magister Teknik Sipil Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November, Surabaya.

Rahayu, M. (2009). Studi Pemilihan Moda Angkutan Penumpang Antara Kereta Api Penataran Dan Bus Ekonomi (Trayek Surabaya – Malang). Tugas Akhir. Tidak Untuk Dipublikasikan, Program Studi Teknik Sipil UPN “Veteran†Jawa Timur, Surabaya.

Rahman, R. (2009). Studi Pemilihan Moda Angkutan Umum Antar Kota Menggunakan Metode Stated Preference. Jurnal SMARTek, vol.7, No.4.

Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D. Cetakan Ke 8. Bandung : Penerbit ALFABETA.

Tamin, O.Z. (2000). Perencanaan dan Permodelan Transportasi. Edisi Kedua. Bandung : Penerbit ITB.

Yosritzal. (2006). Review Pendekatan Stated Preference Dalam Beberapa Penelitian Transportasi Di Kota Padang. Simposium IX FSTPT. Teknik Sipil Universitas Brawijaya Malang, 17-18 November 2006.

Dinas Perhubungan. (2018). Bus Trans Gerbang Kertasusila http://dishub.sidoarjokab.go.id/halstatis-25-bustranssidoarjo.html/ (diakses tanggal 02/02/2018 10:00).

Kereta Api Indonesia. (2018). Kereta Api Komuter. http://keretaapikita.com/jadwal-kereta-api-komuter-surabaya-porong/ (diakses tanggal 02/02/2018 15:00)

Rizkibeo. (2007). Modal Split Model. https://rizkibeo.wordpress.com/2007/11/10/modal-split-model / (diakses tanggal 02/02/2018 11:00).

Diterbitkan

2019-09-30

Terbitan

Bagian

ORIGINAL RESEARCH