IKLAN SEBAGAI FAKTOR PENGGANGGU KENYAMANAN PENGGUNA MEDIA DARING
Keywords:
Communication Noises; Advertising; Digital Media; InternetAbstract
This research explains the attitude of students accessing digital media to advertising impressions on digital media. Primary data collection was carried out by conducting in-depth observations and interviews with informants, and students accessing digital media through smartphones. By using the purposive sampling data snippet technique, the determination of informants is made aware of a number of criteria, namely students who actively access digital media via smartphones, have a sufficient understanding of English, have and are active in social media communication networks, and are active as internet accessors for distance learning purposes. The data from the study showed that not all students who access digital media refused the presence of advertisements. Rejection of ad impressions is based on consideration of the extent to which the appearance of such advertisements interferes with the convenience of the online media communication process. Keywords: Communication Noises; Advertising; Digital Media; Internet.References
R.-A. Salas-Rueda, J. Ramírez-Ortega, C. Alvarado-Zamorano, and A. Domínguez-Hernández, “Students’ Perception About the Incorporation of Technological Tools in the Educational Field During the COVID-19 Pandemic,” Online J. Commun. Media Technol., vol. 12, no. 3, p. e202218, 2022, doi: 10.30935/ojcmt/12168. H. I. Igbo, E. G. Egbe-Okpenge, and R. G. Awopetu, “Influence of Information and Communication Technology on Behavior Problems of Nigerian Youths,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 84, no. 2000, pp. 97–106, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.517. Z. Papacharissi, “The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere,” New Media Soc., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 9–27, 2002, DOI: 10.1177/14614440222226244. J. Dittmar and I. Elks, “Cooperative Learning With and About Internet Forums: A Case Study on a Unit on the Consumption and Chemistry of Mineral Water vs. Tap Water,” Front. Educ., vol. 6, no. January, pp. 1–10, 2022, DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2021.742497. M. A. Petrovici, “E-Public Relations: Impact and Efficiency. A Case Study,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 141, pp. 79–84, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.015. K. Moustafa, “Internet and Advertisement (2016),” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 11948, 2022, DOI: 10.1007/s11948-015-9647-z. T. Kato and K. Tsuda, “Contribution to Purchase Behavior of Voluntary Search Compared to Web Advertisement,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 126, pp. 1329–1335, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.procS.2018.08.083. Y. Azemi, W. Ozuem, R. Wiid, and A. Hobson, “Luxury fashion brand customers’ perceptions of mobile marketing: Evidence of multiple communications and marketing channels,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 66, no. August 2021, p. 102944, 2022, DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.102944. S. Yan, K. M. Miller, and B. Skiera, “How Does the Adoption of Ad Blockers Affect News Consumption?,” J. Mark. Res., p. 2022, 2022, doi: 10.1177/00222437221076160. A. Williams, Patti; Drolet, “Journal of Consumer Research,” Ser. Rev., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 44, 1978, doi: 10.1080/00987913.1978.10763048. C. T. Kao and M. Y. Wang, “The right level of complexity in a banner ad: Roles of construal level and fluency,” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 8016 LNCS, no. PART 1, pp. 604–613, 2013, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-39209-2_67. M. Marza, S. J. Shaaibith, and S. S. Daly, “Impact of oil price fluctuations on human development: A standard study of Iraq,” J. Soc. Sci. Res., vol. 2018, no. Special Issue 5, pp. 396–399, 2018, DOI: 10.32861/jssr.spi5.396.399. L. Dilley, M. Gkartzios, and T. Odagiri, “Developing counterurbanisation: Making sense of rural mobility and governance in Japan,” Habitat Int., vol. 125, no. February, p. 102595, 2022, DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102595. N. Papí-Gálvez, “Online Media and Crisis? of Advertising Media Planning,” adComunica, no. August, pp. 1–14, 2015, DOI: 10.6035/2174-0992.2014.7.3.CITATIONS. L. E. Wallace, D. T. Wegener, M. E. Quinn, and A. J. Ross, “Influences of Position Justification on Perceived Bias: Immediate Effects and Carryover Across Persuasive Messages,” Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull., vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 1188–1204, 2021, DOI: 10.1177/0146167220963678. C. M. B. Klemmensen, “‘Do they understand’? A case study of atypical institutional encounters,” Lang. Commun., no. xxxx, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2022.05.004. L. Zou, D. Zhang, M. Cui, G. Zhang, and Q. Wu, “IRS-assisted covert communication with eavesdropper’s channel and noise information uncertainties,” Phys. Commun., vol. 53, p. 101662, 2022, DOI: 10.1016/j.phycom.2022.101662. A. Aly, D. Weimann-Saks, and G. Weimann, “Making ‘Noise’ Online: An Analysis of the Say No to Terror Online Campaign,” Perspect. Terror., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 33–47, 2014. S. Liu and J. Mair, “The impact of uncertainty on tourists ’ controllability, mood state and the persuasiveness of message framing in the pandemic era,” Tour. Manag., vol. 94, no. February 2022, p. 104634, 2023, DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104634. A. S. Al-Subhi, “Metadiscourse in online advertising: Exploring linguistic and visual metadiscourse in social media advertisements,” J. Pragmat., vol. 187, pp. 24–40, 2022, DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.027. W. R. Iha Haryani Hatta, “E-Lifestyle And Internet Advertising Avoidance,” J. Manaj., vol. 22, no. 3, p. 435, 2018, DOI: 10.24912/jm.v22i3.432. M. Hossain, “Understanding the Attitude of Generation Z Consumers Towards Advertising Avoidance on the Internet,” Eur. J. Bus. Manag., vol. 10, no. 36, pp. 86–96, 2018. J. Estrada-Jiménez, J. Parra-Arnau, A. Rodríguez-Hoyos, and J. Forné, “Online advertising: Analysis of privacy threats and protection approaches,” Comput. Commun., vol. 100, pp. 32–51, 2017, DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2016.12.016. H. Aqil, “The dilemma of children ’ s advertisement on television in Sweden,” 2011. K. L. Lapane, E. Lim, E. McPhillips, A. Barooah, Y. Yuan, and C. E. Dube, “Health effects of loneliness and social isolation in older adults living in congregate long term care settings: A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence,” Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr., vol. 102, no. April, p. 104728, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2022.104728. D. Cheung, “Control in the community: A qualitative analysis of the experience of persons on conditional discharge in Hong Kong,” Int. J. Law Psychiatry, vol. 82, no. March, p. 101791, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2022.101791. S. J. Verma et al., “Protocol of Process Evaluation of Secondary Prevention by Structured Semi-Interactive Stroke Prevention Package in India (SPRINT INDIA)Trial,” Int. J. Qual. Methods, vol. 21, p. 160940692210931, 2022, DOI: 10.1177/16094069221093139. M. Wirzén and A. Čekaitė, “Assessing and assisting prospective adoptive parents: Social workers’ communicative strategies in adoption assessment interviews,” Qual. Soc. Work, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 91–111, 2022, DOI: 10.1177/1473325021989425. M. W. Johnson and L. Leydesdorff, “Redundancies in the communication of music: An operationalization of Schutz’s ‘Making Music Together,’” Syst. Res. Behav. Sci., vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 923–939, 2021, doi: 10.1002/sres.2738.
