PERANAN JUSTICE COLLABORATOR DALAM PERKARA PIDANA

Penulis

  • Ismaya Dwi Agustina Fakultas Hukum Universitas Yos Soedarso Surabaya
  • Muklis Suhendro Fakultas Hukum Universitas Yos Soedarso Surabaya
  • Ricky Rahman Fakultas Hukum Universitas Yos Soedarso Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53027/jp.v2i1.128

Abstrak

Strategic issues which in fact have new dimensions in the realm of criminal law in Indonesia, the material content should be adopted in a higher degree of regulation as has been done by various countries in their legislation such as Witsec (Witness Security Program), Witness Protection Act, Public Disclosure Act, and Public Interest Disclosure Act. It is necessary to design a strong legal foundation and a clear and measurable protection scheme for the disclosure of certain crimes (whistleblowers and justice collaborators), especially in the public apparatus environment related to administration, abuse of power, corruption and those that endanger public interests. In reality, whistleblowers and justice collaborators often do not (even minimal) receive protection, on the contrary, they become targets of gunfire and months in the legal process.The implementation of protection for whistleblowers and justice collaborators in Indonesia is quite good, Susno Duadji as a whistleblower gets a reward in the form of reporting tax cases by him which is one of the judges' considerations in lightening sentences and obtaining protection from LPSK, Likewise Agus Condro who gets protection from LPSK in the form of carry out a prison sentence not in Jakarta but at Alas Roban Batang Prison. Key Word: Justice Colaborator, Crime

Referensi

Buku :

Abul Harris Semendawai, et.al., Memahami Whistleblower, ( Jakarta : LPSK, 2011).

Adam Chazawi, Hukum Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Alumni, Bandung, 2008.

Ahmad Yani, anggota Komisi III DPR-RI Fraksi PPP.

Andi Hamzah, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, ( Jakarta : Sinar Grafika , 2012 ).

Mr. S.M. Amin, Hukum Acara Pengadilan Negeri, ( Jakarta:Pradya Paramita, 1981).

Philipus. M Hadjon dan Tatiek Sri, 2005, ARGUMENTASI HUKUM, Yogyakarta:UGM pers.

Soenarto Surodibroto, KUHP Dan KUHAP Dilengkapi Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung DanHoge Raad (Jakarta : Radjagrafindo Persada, 2007).

Subekti. dan R. Tjitro Soedibia, Kamus Hukum , ( Jakarta:Pradya Paramita, 1976).

Suryono Sutarto, Hukum Acara Pidana, Jilid I, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kartini, Surabaya, 1982.

Peraturan perundang-undangan:

Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana

Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia, Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia, Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Republik Indonesia, dan Ketua Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Bersama tentang Perlindungan Bagi Pelapor, Saksi Pelapor, dan Saksi Pelaku yang Bekerjasama, Nomor : 1 Tahun 2011, Nomor : KEPB-02/01-55/12/2011, Nomor : 1 Tahun 2011, Nomor : KEPB-02/01-55/12/2011, Nomor 4 Tahun 2011.

Internet :

Angelina Sondakh dan Justice Collaborator, diakses melalui http :// www.mediaindonesia.com/read/2012/05/01/316587/70/13/Angelina Sondakh dan Justice Collaborator.

Mary B. Curtis, “Whistleblower Mechanisms: A Study of the Perception of ‘Users’ and ‘Responders’“, The Dallas Chapter of the Institute of Internal Auditors (April 2006).

Diterbitkan

2018-06-30

Terbitan

Bagian

ORIGINAL RESEARCH